The governments of the Middle East Regional Security complex owe much of their legitimacy to religion of Islam. Therefore, they are either claiming the Islamic government or they are ...
Read More
The governments of the Middle East Regional Security complex owe much of their legitimacy to religion of Islam. Therefore, they are either claiming the Islamic government or they are trying to show their commitment to Islam in some way. The first case result of this factor will be a common and prominent identity in the solidarity and closeness of these countries. But with a little tolerance, it can be said that often Conflicts and violence in the Middle East - albeit ostensibly - are rooted in religious conflicts, especially religious ones.This paper seeks to examine, in a case study, the distinction between the true and potential status of religious communities in the Middle East and its current status in the context of the geocultural challenge of religions and sects in the path to regional peace and security. The question in this study is how, despite their scope of acceptance, does Islam not have the ability to prevent violence and conflict and, consequently, to establish peace and stability through the enjoyment of shared beliefs among its followers? In this regard, Copenhagen's security-oriented and regionalist approach has been used to better explain the approach.The research hypothesis is that the domination of the centralized state and the weakness and deviations of transnational religious groups have led to the instrumental and corresponding use of the Middle Eastern identity-oriented states of religious and religious identity to gain legitimacy and make others illegitimate.
